This article analyzes the rational and irrational classification of contextual argumentation from a philosophical and theoretical perspective. The study includes a number of fundamental concepts that represent the levels of reflection of reality by the human mind, among which the special status of...

This article provides a philosophical and theoretical analysis of the rational and irrational classification of contextual argumentation. The study demonstrates that rational argumentation is based on logic, evidence, and experience, while irrational argumentation relies on intuition, belief, and...